Connect with us

News and Report

Timipre Sylva Accept Defeat: “I couldn’t have won Bayelsa poll with PDP in charge” — Sylva

Published

on

Former Governor of Bayelsa State and candidate of the All Progressives Congress in the 2015 governorship election, Timipre Sylva, who blames his loss in the recently held poll on malpractices, spoke to select journalists in Yenagoa, the state capital. Society Reporters bring to your his excerpts….

The Bayelsa State governorship election has been won and lost. What is your assessment of the prolonged Bayelsa State 2015 governorship election which was concluded on January 9 this year?

The results of the Bayelsa State governorship election declared on Sunday, January 10, 2016, did not meet with our acceptance at all, as a party and as a person.

What are your misgivings?

Ab initio, I am sure you are familiar with the fact that I have always complained about the Independent National Electoral Commission in Bayelsa State. Even in a court of law, if an accused person is to stand trial before a judge and the accused person says that he cannot expect justice from a particular judge, usually something is done about it. In this case, we were contesting an election and I said from the beginning that I did not have confidence in the Resident Electoral Commissioner and in the Administrative Secretary (of INEC), and that I did not expect a free and fair election if these people were going to preside over the election.

What actions did you take to express your worries?

I complained about the issue over and over again. I even reduced it (complaint) to writing and we sent a petition. Usually, before an election of this nature, INEC officials are switched; sometimes they send them to another state and bring another electoral commissioner. But this time, they chose to keep this team that was already in place, set up by the Peoples Democratic Party as a rigging machine. This was the same team that returned almost 100 per cent of all voters in Bayelsa to the former President (Goodluck Jonathan) in Bayelsa State. And we felt that these people could not have given us a free and fair treatment. We said it over and over again.

What did the electoral body do in its response to your complaints and petition?

Unfortunately, our cries fell on deaf ears. On Sunday, they proved themselves true to type. We believed that the election could even have been declared inconclusive on Sunday because there were still a lot of votes outstanding — 53,000 votes — and they still declared the results against the law.

Are you saying the election was skewed against you?

If you look at the whole election, the election was skewed against the All Progressives Congress from the very beginning. Anywhere APC won, results were cancelled; anywhere PDP won, results were entered. The process of distributing materials was rigged. We had it on good authority that all the vehicles to move electoral materials were all provided by the PDP for INEC.

Was it an understanding the political parties had with the INEC?

Of course, INEC will say that they provided the money but some officers decided, probably, to pocket that money and went for those vehicles from the PDP. The understanding we had with INEC was very clear: take materials to the Registration Area Centres and then move materials from the RACs to the various units. Suddenly, that was changed by INEC here in Bayelsa and they started moving materials to communities and to units, in some cases, from Yenagoa. So, while our people gathered at the RAC to be part of the process of distributing the materials, they suddenly heard that their materials were already in their communities. By the time they got to their communities, a lot of our leaders in these communities could not even enter their communities anymore because the communities had been taken over by gunmen and thugs of the PDP.

Are you inferring that there was collusion between INEC and the PDP?

There was collusion between INEC and the PDP. Even the cancellations were clearly collusion. We feel that we have not had a free and a fair treatment. I believe that in any free and fair election in Bayelsa — I am sure all of you will bear me witness — APC will win. But, unfortunately, while we were trying to be fair, the opponent was bent on rigging the process. As we heard, they were bent on keeping Bayelsa. Then, there was no way one could win because they (the PDP) were just bent from the beginning on rigging the process.

Now that the results have been declared and your opponent returned as governor, what is your next move?

Yes, the results have been announced but as far as we are concerned, as a party, these results are completely unacceptable to us. However, we have called all APC members to keep calm; there is no need for anybody to take law into their hands. We will seek redress in a competent court of law. But I will like to just put this on record that as far as APC is concerned, what happened in Bayelsa was not a proper election. It was just the normal impunity of the PDP that played out. Of course, these institutions were already set up by the PDP. They were inherited by this government and it will take a while before we see a complete disappearance of this attitude in Nigeria. So far, we have told our supporters to stay calm and wait for instructions from us. I thought I should address you and let you know the position of our party.

What does the law say about cancelled votes; does it say that during supplementary poll, cancelled votes do not count or is it that this election is a unique one?

The law did not say that cancelled votes will not matter at any stage at all. The law is clear: if the votes that are cancelled are more than the difference between the winner and the next person, then elections should hold again in those areas where results were cancelled. That is the position of the law. But, unfortunately, the law was turned upside-down very clearly in this case and we feel that that is not right. I think at some point, the PDP and INEC were desperate to announce a winner; they just didn’t want to go through that process all over again. I think that’s what happened but, of course, that doesn’t make it right at all. And as far as we are concerned, we are going to discuss with our lawyers.

You raised issues against the REC and the administrative secretary. The Edo State Governor, Adams Oshiomhole, had raised a similar issue against the REC in Edo and the REC was changed. What response did you get from the INEC on your petition?

As far as the REC was concerned, I did not just write a petition; I did not just ask for the change of the REC. Even the REC, at some point, began to take issues with us (candidates), accusing a faceless candidate of offering him bribe. A REC like that, who is already quarrelling with the candidates in an election, was allowed to conduct the same election. I have never seen this; it has never happened anywhere, not even in Nigeria before. But, unfortunately, I didn’t get a reprieve as you know. In that case, you don’t expect me to now opt out of the election because they had refused to change the REC.

I was forced as a candidate. If I said I wasn’t going to subject myself to the election, what were the options? I don’t have any option. INEC is the body to conduct the election. I have cried out to INEC over and over again to change the REC but INEC refused to change the REC. What will I do? Of course, I went into the election, unfortunately hoping that the REC would have a change of heart. But, you can see from the event that they were just bent on making sure that the APC loses that election. If you look at the event from the very beginning on December 5, we won in a local government area, they cancelled a section of that local government and reordered (rescheduled the) election the next day, almost without informing us. We didn’t even know on December 5, 2015 that election was holding in those areas.

Meanwhile, there were other areas as well that were outstanding from that same election but those areas that they were interested in, they quickly held a rerun on Sunday and then said there was going to be a rerun for the rest of other areas on the 9th of January. Why didn’t they shift the rerun in those areas as well? Why didn’t they hold the rerun that were pending also on Sunday that they held those other elections?

What happened on January 9?

You can see INEC was playing a game from the beginning. The INEC in Bayelsa was set as part of the rigging machine of the PDP and I have said it over and over. If you look at what happened on Saturday (January 9), how can they ever justify a situation where materials to the farthest communities were sent last and materials to the nearest communities were sent first? They knew that the farthest communities were some of our strongholds. They sent materials to communities like Enewari a day before. Enewari is like 30 minutes from Yenagoa. But they didn’t send materials to a place like Forupa, to a place like Azuzuama and to a place like Ikubie. These are places that are six hours by speedboat. And they started the journey by boat in the morning of the election and when they got to Ikubie, they insisted that they were going to deliver these materials from one community to community. At six o’clock in the evening, my people were calling me that they were still distributing materials in those communities. What the PDP wanted to do, we knew about it. Their strategy was to frustrate the election in Southern Ijaw because they felt that they already had a lead; they felt if the election held in a few places, it will be enough for them (INEC) to declare them (winner).

They colluded with the INEC to frustrate the election in Southern Ijaw. The election really didn’t hold in Southern Ijaw. In most places where the election held, as long as it was the APC that won, it was cancelled. Not at the unit level; no result was cancelled at the unit level. The cancellation was done mostly at the local government area collation level, which is a misnomer. And when we said that results should be cancelled at the state level, the panel said they didn’t have any powers to cancel election results at that level. That same panel that claimed that they did not have powers to cancel results invoked the power to cancel Southern Ijaw results on the 5th of December, even before the results arrived and while collation was ongoing. But suddenly, they didn’t have that power anymore, as long as it was the APC that was making the case.

But INEC sent two additional RECs. Didn’t it?

Clearly, there was collusion between the local INEC and the PDP. Some people will say it was okay that they sent more RECs — two other RECs from Cross River and Delta States. But then, you ask the question: when did those RECs arrive? By the time those RECs arrived, the damage had already been done. All the Supervising Presiding Officers had been appointed and the SPOs were mostly their people. When I made a case that the SPOs were mostly their people, the REC told me that the instruction was for him to use experienced SPOs. That means these SPOs should be SPOs that have conducted an election before. And what were those elections before: The presidential election and the House of Assembly elections, and you know the outcome of those elections. The same set of SPOs was used; the same set that rigged the other elections for them.

The same set of collation officers was appointed. When we protested, they said they had to appoint only the same people. How were we expected to win an election where the PDP rigging machine was still very (much) intact and its people were just drafted? It was very clear. I likened it to a rat being in a cat’s court. Of course, the result can be guessed by anybody because the rat can never be right in a cat’s court. That was the kind of situation that we found ourselves.

One of the issues that marred the election was violence. The APC was accused of perpetrating violence during the poll. Do you agree?

We agree that there was violence during the election but that violence can be traced, in all cases, to the doorstep of only the PDP. Our people were actually the victims of the violence — before, during and after the election. I said ‘after’ because even as I speak, some unknown people went to the country home of my state agent and destroyed it. Today, as I speak, some PDP thugs went and dealt machete cuts on an APC member in a place in Nembe. All these are still ongoing. As far as we are concerned, this senseless violence must stop. The violence in Ekeremor, you are all familiar with. This election was procured by the PDP, I am sure, wholesale. I am sure it was a turnkey project; they were supposed to return everything wholesale for certain things to be paid; I do not know how much. If you look at the election in Yenagoa, one of the collation officers was the younger sister of the Director of Publicity of Dickson Campaign Organisation, Mr. Jonathan Obuebite. How can anybody win in her unit or ward. Of course, they had the materials and everything in a corner and wrote (the) results and came back. Of course, INEC was on hand to receive the results. That is what happened all through that election.

In Southern Ijaw, it was learnt that election did not hold in Ward 17 and over 39,000 votes were cancelled. What actually happened?

Those results were not meant to be entered at all. It was deliberate. Materials for the whole of those areas were sent deliberately late on the day of that election. And that is our stronghold. The materials arrived there very late. It was a collusion between INEC and the PDP.

 

 

 

@ Sunday Punch

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Netizens Slam Senator For Donating Burial Materials To Constituents Amidst Hardship

Published

on

By

Netizens have taken a swipe at Senator Rufai Hanga, who’s representing Kano Central Senatorial District, for donating 5,000 pieces of white fabric and clay pots to his constituents.

We gathered that the donation came amidst hardship that is currently rocking the country.

The donation is meant to assist with the burial process for loved ones, in response to the frequent requests for burial assistance from constituents.

Premium Times reports that Dawuud Auwal, one of Hanga’s social media aides, announced the donations on Facebook.

Auwal reportedly wrote, “We are used to these frequent requests from people soliciting money to buy white cloths and clay pots. Some have requested vehicles for transporting the dead.”

The senator, whose district covers 15 Local Government Areas, is an accountant who has been representing Kano Central since 2023, on the platform New Nigeria Peoples Party.

The Senator’s gesture is said to be in line with the traditional Muslim burial customs observed in the North.

White fabric is traditionally used to wrap the deceased, followed by broken clay pots as the initial covering before burial in sand.

Netizens have criticised the donation on the grounds that the Senator ought to have built hodpitals to attend to the the health of the people. They added that what the people need succour to ameliorate the hardship occassioned by the high cost of foodstuffs and not burial materials.

A pro-Hausa organisation, which uses the handle @VoiceofHausa, said, “This is a constituency project of Sen. Rufa’i Sani Hanga, Senator representing Kano Central.

“Instead of building hospitals, he distributed 5,000 pots and white cloths for the burial of the people of his senatorial District.”

SILAS TAFI-WARWAR, tweeting as @silastafi, said, “I don’t understand…. Is he wishing them dead or something?

“What is the rationale behind this gift or donation? Constituency project or something?

“In the face of hunger, serious hardship and unemployment! This is all He can do?”

A tweep, FAISAL, who identifies as @Iamumarfaisal, said, “This should be his personal assistance to his community as an influential and wealthy person. But making this look [like] a performance index being a Senator is shameless and denigrates the people he represents. We can do better Arewa.”

Continue Reading

News and Report

Viral list of ex-govs under investigation over alleged corruption false, misleading – EFCC

Published

on

By

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC has refuted a purported list of former governors under investigation for alleged corruption, which has now gone viral.

There were reports in the media that 58 former governors were under the investigation of the anti-graft agency over alleged corruption.

The former governors, according to reports, were accused of misappropriating N2.187 trillion over 25 years.

The 58 former governors were being probed, while others have been investigated, and prosecuted.

Reacting to the development, the EFCC spokesman, Dele Oyewale, in a statement on Sunday, described the reports as false and misleading.

He said, “the so-called list is a disingenuous fabrication designed to achieve motives known only to the authors.

“The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, feels obliged to dissociate itself from a phantom report circulating in sections of the media claiming it has released a full list of ex- governors being investigated for alleged corruption.

“The report headlined: “EFCC Releases Full List of 58 Ex- Governors that Embezzled N2 .187 Trillion”, in one of the news outlets, is false and mischievous as the Commission neither issued the said list nor entertained discussions on investigation of ex-governors with any news medium.”

The anti-graft agency, however, urged the public to disregard the report, saying “it is false and misleading.”

It also urged media practitioners to crosscheck facts about matters under investigation with the Commission to avoid misleading the public with false and inaccurate reports.

Recall that the EFCC has been probing some former governors over allegations of corruption and misappropriation of public funds.

The anti-graft agency is probing former Governor, Yahaya Bello of Kogi State.

He has been arraigned on 19 counts bordering on alleged money laundering, breach of trust, and misappropriation of funds to the tune of N80.2 billion.

According to the EFCC, the embattled ex-governor withdrew $720,000 from the state’s accounts to pay his child’s school fees in advance just before he left office on January 27, 2024.

The EFCC said Bello moved the money from the state coffers to a Bureau de Change operator, and used the money for his child’s school fee in advance.

 

Continue Reading

News and Report

Dangote University explains how female student died in her off-campus apartment

Published

on

By

Tragedy struck on Thursday at the Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Wudil, Kano State, when a female student, Aishat Yahaya Olabisi, was found dead in her off-campus apartment.

Olabisi, a 300-level female student of Food and Science Technology, was said to have been found dead after she returned to her room from the school.

The deceased student was said to have written her first examination in the ongoing first-semester examination at the university on the fateful day.

One of the male students who spoke to PUNCH Online on condition of anonymity on Saturday blamed her sudden passing away on examination pressure.

“The deceased was hale and hearty before she went out to write her first examination in the ongoing first-semester examination,” the student said.

However, following reports in the media that the female student died in the university students’ hostel, the Management of the university clarified the misinformation.

In a statement by the Dean, Students Affairs of the university, Prof. Abdulkadir Dambazau, dated 3rd May 2024, refuted the media claims.

The statement titled “Clarification Regarding False Statement About Student’s Death” read, “It has come to our attention that a recent statement made by DLC Hausa and some media outlets regarding the discovery of a student’s corpse at the students’ hall of residence is entirely false. We wish to address this matter promptly and unequivocally refute these claims.

“On 23 April 2024, we received news about the untimely passing of Yahaya Aishat Olabisi, a diligent and bright student of ADUSTECH Wudil. Aishat spent her last evening engrossed in her studies, diligently preparing for upcoming examinations. The following morning after a shared breakfast with her roommate and a heartfelt conversation with her father, she expressed her intent to rest briefly before resuming her studies. However, destiny had a different plan.

“In the early afternoon of the same day, concerns arose when Yahaya Aishat Olabisi did not respond to attempts to reach her. Upon investigation, it was discovered that she had passed away in her sleep in her off-campus residence. Immediate measures were taken, and she was swiftly taken to the university clinic, where her passing was confirmed by medical professionals.”

The statement added that Olabisi’s remains had been transferred to the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital for postmortem analysis.

“Given the circumstances, her remains were transferred to Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital for postmortem analysis to ascertain the cause of her sudden demise. Meanwhile, her grieving parents, who hail from Ilorin arrived the following day to bid farewell to their beloved daughter.

“In honouring her memory and bidding her farewell, Aishat was laid to rest on 24 April 2024, surrounded by family, friends, and members of the academic community who mourned her loss deeply,” the statement added.

Continue Reading

Trending