Connect with us

News and Report

NDDC PROBE: SELF INDICTMENT! HOW SENATOR PETER NWAOBOSHI NAILED HIMSELF WITH BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION.

Published

on

It was Nuhu Ribadu, in the height of his glory as an anti-corruption tsar, who said “When you fight corruption, it fights back.” If there is any politician today living the truism of Ribadu’s immortal words, it is Minister of Niger-Delta Affairs, Godswill Akpabio. It is an understatement to say that the former governor of Akwa Ibom has been facing barrage of attacks from different angles since he made a firm resolve to ensure that it would not be business as usual in the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC). To him, what he saw did not reflect the huge billions of dollars that had been plunged into the Commission over the years. As such, he was ready to transform things not minding whose ox is gored.

But many a man is enslaved to innate demons. Led by the beasts within, they commit dastardly acts of savagery and corruption only to confess at the end, alleging a faltered mental state, abject penury and the threat of death, among other extreme circumstances. If what Senator Peter Nwaoboshi said about the alleged award of contract to Akpabio is anything to be accorded any attention, he certainly fits in the bill. By his submission, Nwaoboshi has failed to understand that there is so much a man could say to back up an irrational behaviour, like bribery and corruption.

Besides the fact that Nwaoboshi’s allegation against Akpabio has been trashed as mere figment of his sterile imagination and a porous lie with holes in it, one question that the Senator representing Delta North senatorial district must answer is what is his motive for trying to tarnish a man who is doing his best possible to make sure that true development is enthroned in the Niger-Delta, away from the ruse of the past.

It should be noted that prior to Akpabio’s coming on board as Minister under whom the supervision of NDDC falls, Nwaoboshi had no problems with the culture of sleaze and corrupt enrichment of a few pockets who cleaned out in the Commission. Now that Akpabio has remained resolute that the books of the Commission must be looked into, Nwaoboshi has suddenly been feeling uneasy. Only a man with some skeletons in his wardrobe should be wary of a probe instituted to clean the Augean stable. Why this panicky mode if Nwaoboshi had not soiled his hand?

With an institution like the National Assembly which has been suffering from integrity deficit in the court of public opinion, every right thinking person expects a senator of Nwaoboshi’s standing to lend his support to his former colleague to ensure things are done well in the Commission.

The fact that Nwaoboshi even raised allegation of corruption buttresses Akpabio’s stance that the Commission’s financial dealings be audited.

Until recently, blinding and intolerable sleaze was the name of the game at the NDDC where the main players thought that its treasury was their private cash-point. Since his appointment in July 2019, Akpabio has spoken extensively of how corruption among NDDC officials and contractors has prevented the commission from achieving its mandate of developing the country’s Niger Delta region. “I think people were treating the place as an ATM where you just walk in there to go and pluck money and go away, I don’t think they were looking at it as an interventionist agency,” he said.

There were also cases of contractors collecting money for contracts that were never or haphazardly done or abandoned halfway. Such infrastructural carcasses dot the Niger Delta. All of these had virtually driven the agency into the doldrums.

The former Senator, therefore, constituted the Interim Management Committee to countervail the monumental sleaze, rid the NDDC of corrupt elements and help it recover as much funds from fraudulent contractors as possible. But this was, understandably, not warmly received by beneficiaries of the corrupt system who resorted to planting falsehood in the media to smear the IMC, NDDC and its supervising minister. Several attempts to make the president disband the committee were frustrated.

The approval of the tenure extension of the Professor Keme Pondei-led Interim Management Committee from May 1 to December 31, 2020, by President Muhammadu Buhari, has, however, changed the dynamics.

The tenure extension will cover the period of the forensic audit of the NDDC as approved by the Federal Executive Council. The audit became expedient given the groundswell of corruption in the agency.

Coming on the heels of sustained campaigns of calumny against Godswill Akpabio, who superintends over the NDDC and is the mastermind of the IMC, the tenure extension is seen as perfectly taking the wind out of the sail of corrupt elements and vested interests in the NDDC.

Niger-Delta leader and elder statesman, Chief Edwin Clark has chosen his path by showing support for IMC as he has even called on the leadership of the National Assembly to probe their members against whom sundry allegations of corruption have been levelled by the acting MD of the IMC, Pondei, and the acting Executive Director of Projects, Dr. Cairo Ojougboh? The question is why is Nwaoboshi not toeing the honourable path like Chief Clark if he truly cares for the region as he has often mouthed.

As for his allegations, Nwaoboshi who is the Senate Committee chairman on NDDC, lied against Akpabio on N300 Million fencing contract. Akpabio has denied ever being an NDDC contractor. He has explained that what is being bandied around as a letter requesting for NDDC projects contract was zonal intervention projects of the Senate minority leader (whom he was from 2015 to 2019). The intervention projects were different from NDDC projects.

Zonal intervention projects of NASS are not done with NDDC budget. Project intervention, which has a threshold for each Senator and each House of Representative member, is a federally approved program of the NASS annually. The Senators suggest the projects in writing within their envelopes but they go through SDG. In most cases, Senators do not know the companies that won those jobs after due process by the domiciling agencies.

 

  • The Capital

News and Report

May Day: Glo salutes Nigerian workers  

Published

on

By

 

Digital telecommunications solutions provider, Globacom, has saluted Nigerian workers as the country observes this year’s edition of the International Workers’ Day. The company enjoined them to rededicate themselves to excellence so as to take Nigeria to the next level.

 

In a solidarity message released on Tuesday, Globacom lauded the resilient spirit of workers in spite of present challenges. It urged them to use the opportunity of the Workers’ Day to reflect on how their contributions can build a better and more vibrant society.

 

“We salute Nigerian workers on this this day and commend them for the hard work, commitment, resourcefulness and industry which are essential for the growth of the economy of any nation”, Globacom said, and urged them not to rest on their oars.

 

The company noted that the story of Nigeria cannot be complete without the huge contributions of workers, both in the public and private sectors.

 

The International Labour Day is observed annually on May 1 to recognize the contributions of workers all over the world. It is also used to promote a fairer and more sustainable future for all by advocating for workers

’ rights.

 

Continue Reading

News and Report

How Adeduntan Resigned As First Bank CEO On CBN’s Order

Published

on

By

There are strong indications that the sudden resignation of former Managing Director and CEO of First Bank, Dr Adesola Adeduntan was triggered by directives from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
LEADERSHIP gathered that news of his resignation broke in Nigeria while Adeduntan was still attending the World Bank/IMF Spring Meetings in Washington DC.

The former CEO suddenly notified the board of his intention to leave with effect from April 20, eight full months to the expiration of the third term of three years which he won as a reprieve by former CBN governor Godwin Emefiele.

Announcing his retirement, the MD said: “As you are aware, my contract would be expiring on 31 December 2024 after which I would no longer be eligible for employment within the Bank having served as the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank for a record time of nine years.

“During this period the Bank and its subsidiaries has undergone significant changes and broken new grounds. We have repositioned the institution as an enviable financial giant in Africa. I have however decided to proceed on retirement with effect from 20 April 2024 to pursue other interests.

“I am eternally grateful to the board of directors of FirstBank and FBN Holdings Plc for the support that I received from them during my stewardship. I wish our iconic institution continued success and progress as we move into the next phase of its evolution.”

Messages sent to the Bank were not replied as at the time of writing this report.
According to one inside source, “there are several moving parts in the unfolding drama.
There is the matter of an unresolved issue flagged by the regulator years ago and how this has not been fully resolved to the satisfaction of the apex bank and there is also the issue of mismanagement of relationships and added to this is the question of ego.”

One source said following the questions raised by the central bank, the initial target had been the entire board of the bank itself and there is a suggestion the apex bank dialled back once it realised that the current board of the bank was appointed by the CBN itself.

Recall that FBN Holdings Plc also cancelled its Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) scheduled for April 30th, 2024 to get shareholders’ approval on the raising of N300 billion capital.
Before this sudden resignation there had been expectation that Adeduntan would take up the position of managing director at the HoldCo level but it is unclear if this plan was abandoned because the regulator withheld its approval of the request from the bank. There is what is called a two-year “cooling off period” imposed by the regulator between directorship tenures in banks in Nigeria and this may have counted against the plot for Adeduntan to move up.

On April 28, 2021 former directors at a board meeting of the bank had voted for Adeduntan to be retired as his second term was to expire but he regained his position after the board was sacked by CBN Governor Emefiele.

It is unclear why the bank CEO is leaving now but First Bank has had a policy by which Managing Directors of the bank were allowed only two terms of three years each. Adeduntan would have been the first CEO to last three full terms on the job.

“As you are aware, my contract would be expiring on 31 December 2024 after which I would no longer be eligible for employment within the Bank having served as the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank for a record time of nine years,” Adeduntan said in his letter resigning.

According to the letter, “during this period the Bank and its subsidiaries have undergone significant changes and broken new grounds. We have repositioned the institution as an enviable financial giant in Africa. “I have however decided to proceed on retirement with effect from 20 April 2024 to pursue other interests.”

Furthermore, he expressed gratitude towards the board of directors of First Bank and FBN Holdings for the support he received from them during his tenure.

Adeduntan was appointed as CEO of First Bank in 2016. Prior to his appointment, he served as the bank’s executive director and chief financial officer (CFO). Before joining First Bank in July 2014, he was a director and the pioneer CFO/business manager of Africa Finance Corporation (AFC). Adeduntan formerly worked as a senior vice-president and CFO at Citibank Nigeria Limited, as a senior manager in the financial services group of KPMG Professional Services, and as a manager at Arthur Andersen Nigeria.

* The Leadership Newspaper

Continue Reading

News and Report

CBN Director: How I Collected $600,000 Bribe For Emefiele

Published

on

By

A former Director of Information Technology of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mr. John Ayoh, has explained how he collected $600,000 allegedly for contract gratification for the embattled ex-apex bank governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele.

Ayoh, while being led in evidence by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) counsel, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), on Monday, April 29, told an Ikeja Special Offences Court that he spent eight years in the apex bank.

He told the court that he received a letter from the agency concerning two transactions which he facilitated through Emefiele.

Ayoh, Head of Procurement and Support Services (PSS) Department, told the court that the first envelope containing $400,000 was brought to his house in Lekki while he received the second envelope containing $200,000 at the Tinubu Head Office of the CBN.

Ayoh said he was vested with powers to receive applications for award of contracts to select successful bidders.

According to him, the first leg of the transaction was at his residence in Lekki Phase One while the second envelope money he received occurred at the Tinubu Head Office of the CBN.

He said: “The man to deliver the second transaction came to our office in Lagos and I informed the governor but he said he did not want to see a third party that I should bring the envelope myself.

“I complied with the instruction and went to his office and delivered it. Mr John Adeola was the one I sent my address to and he came to my house. He is the governor’s assistant and the total money I received on his behalf was $400,000 and $200,000, respectively.”

The witness informed the court that the vendors who allegedly brought the envelopes with money were in charge of the implementation of Netapp Storage Architectural and Infrastructural Services.

While under cross-examination by the first defence counsel, Mr. Olalekan Ojo (SAN), he told the court that his schedule of duties did not include running errands for Emefiele but he directly worked under him.

Ayoh confirmed to the court that Emefiele was not a member of the PSS but a member of the Major Contract Tender Committee (MCTC).

He added that he had never facilitated in the commission of any crime.

Ojo asked if the witness wrote in his statement that he was forced to aid or abet the commission of accepting gratification.

The witness said: “I do not remember the exact word that I used and I did not write in my statement that I opened the two envelopes on the two occasions to check the total sum of money.

“I wrote a statement and it implied that the money in the envelopes was given to me to influence the award of contract. I did not take part in the decision of the MCTC but I recommended that the award be given and I was not bribed.

“I was invited by the EFCC on February 17, I was not arrested but I returned home on administrative bail.”

The witness told the court that he operated under duress, while he received the two envelopes from the contractors.

“On your honour, did you indicate in your statement that you were acting under duress while running errands for the first defendant,” the learned silk asked.

The prosecution, however, objected to the question and argued that the statement of the witness was not before the court.

The first defence counsel sought that the statement of the defendant be admitted into evidence.

Justice Rahman Oshodi, thereafter, admitted the statement of the witness (three pages) into evidence, following arguments and counter arguments of the counsel.

The Senior Advocate reteirated that the witness showed to the court where it was written in his statement that he acted under duress.

The witness told the court that the instructions from Emefiele indicated that he bent rules.

The judge, thereafter, adjourned the case until May 3 for continuation of cross-examination.

Emefiele’s counsel also pleaded with the court to release the defendant to him on self-recognition because he had not met with his bail application.

The learned silk, however, prayed the court that the defendant would meet up before May 17.

There was no objections from the second defence counsel and the prosecution left the decision at the discretion of the court.

 

Continue Reading

Trending