Connect with us

News and Report

How investors stall govt’s drive for private refineries…

Published

on

Like a failed dream, the strategic plan to mobilise private interest in local crude oil refining may have run into a brick wall.

 

The licencees for private refineries have recoiled into their respective shells, seeking other opportunities in the oil and gas sector.

 

The Federal Government has since 2002 to date, issued over 39 licences to private operators to establish refineries of various capacities in the country, to lift the profile of local refining capacity from the current 445,000 barrels per day (bpd), a result of ill-maintained low capacity utilisation of four facilities owned by the government.

 

But so far, only the Niger Delta Petroleum Resources, located in Ogbelle, Rivers State, with Dr. Layi Fatona as the promoter, has commenced production of 1,000bpd of refined oil.  Also, Orient Petroleum Resources Plc has completed the detailed engineering, sourced the modules of its refinery and completed site acquisition, perimeter and topographical surveys, geotechnical, geological and hydro-geological surveys, site civil engineering works prior to construction of internal roads and reinforced concrete plinths for installation of refinery equipment.  But it is yet to start production.

 

Indeed, virtually all the licensed operators had serially defaulted on their respective deadlines to commence production, leading to licence withdrawals on their part, with even increased reluctance for mandate renewals as stipulated in the enabling law.

 

Factors cited as challenges for the takeoff of the various projects by the licensees included huge upfront start-up fee; lack of sovereign guarantees to secure cheaper loans from the international finance market; and uncertainty over guarantee of free market pricing policy.

 

Despite government’s reconsideration of the start-up fee in favour of the licencees, the investors still failed to show serious commitment, thereby truncating initial objective of the private refineries’ initiative.

 

However, a source at the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) told The Guardian that the agency had already processed new applications for private refineries and that they were now awaiting approval from the Ministry of Petroleum Resources.

 

The source said that the new applicants were depot owners who may not have the challenges of bank guarantees.

 

The source added that the 39 licences would have been able to process over 2.654 million barrels per day, which would have reduced the country’s dependence on fuel importation.

 

For instance, Amakpe Refinery Plant, one of the companies that got a  licence was configured to process 6,000bpd of crude oil from Qua Iboe.

 

The existing four local refineries (445,000 bpd capacity) only contributed about four to 20 per cent in the past five years to the national Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) consumption in the country.

 

The Guardian’s enquiries revealed that in May 2002, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) granted licences to 18 private refineries to operate out of which only one was able to come on stream.

 

The successful applicants were: Akwa Ibom Refining and Petrochemicals Limited, Badagry Petroleum Refinery Limited, Clean Waters Refinery, Ilaje Refinery and Petrochemicals, Niger Delta Refinery and Petrochemical Company Limited, NSP Refineries and Oil Services Limited, Ode-Aye Refinery Limited, and Orient Petroleum Resources Limited.

 

Others were Owena Oil and Gas Limited, Rivgas Petroleum and Energy Limited, Sapele Petroleum Limited, Southland Associates Limited, and South-West Refineries and Petrochemical Company, Starex Petroleum Refinery Limited, The Chasewood Consortium, Tonwei Refinery, Total Support Refineries, and Union Atlantic Petroleum Limited.

 

As at 2010, Amakpe International Refinery Incorporated with capacity to process 12,000 bpd got its approval to operate revalidated in 2007, but got stuck due to political reasons in Akwa Ibom State.

 

Resources Petroleum and Petrochemicals International Incorporated with capacity to process 100,000bpd, located in Ikot Abasi, Akwa Ibom State, also got its Approval To Construct (ATC) revalidated in 2010. Sapele Petroleum Limited with 100,000bpd located in Sapele, Delta State, also got its ATC revalidated in 2010. Rehoboth Natural Resources Limited, with capacity to process 12,000bpd got permission to operate in 2008, but applied to convert ATC to Licence To Establish (LTE) as 2010.

 

Amexum Corporation with capacity to produce 100,000bpd, complained of lack of financing which stalled the project’s takeoff. Antonio Oil, located in Ogun State, with capacity to produce 27,000bpd, commenced civil and structural works on its site, but was unable to go farther.

 

Gasoline Associates International Limited Refinery, located in Ipokia Ogun State, with 100,000bpd capacity got its LTC granted and was also unable to continue.

 

Ologbo Refinery Company Nigeria Limited, located in Ologbo, Edo State, with 12,000bpd capacity, completed its engineering package, but its licence was not renewed by DPR and could therefore not go further.

 

On the upfront start-up fee, DPR sources noted that ‘ultimately, the government reconsidered and accordingly reduced the fee in line with investors’ expectation; in spite of this concession, the investors still failed to show serious commitment; raising funds locally was obviously a problem, as bank interest rates of 20 per cent and above would make borrowing for such a project a suicidal mission!

 

‘On the other hand, much cheaper foreign loans required certain sovereign guarantees that government did not consider necessary.  Other investors demanded a free market pricing policy that eliminated subsidies, as the uncertainty and time lag related to subsidy refunds could jeopardise the ultimate  success of such ventures.’

 

When it became evident to DPR in 2007 that the majority of the 18 oil refinery licencees in Nigeria did not have either the financial resources or engineering expertise or the zeal to follow DPR’s specific guidelines,  it  cancelled all the outstanding licences and only a few reapplied under more strenuous guidelines.

 

The source said that when it became evident that the investors were complaining of the stringent conditions, the DPR removed the statutory $1million performance deposit required from investors, for the establishment of private refineries in Nigeria.

 

He said: ‘The government had realised that the deposit requirement was a disincentive to investors who were willing to establish refineries in the country. The requirement, which is contained in the ‘Guidelines for the establishment of hydrocarbon processing plant (Refinery & Petrochemicals) in Nigeria,’ states that a $1million refundable deposit is to be made by an investor for every 10,000bpd refinery capacity to be established.

 

He stated that this move was part of government’s strategy to encourage private sector participation in crude oil refining and also her desire to locally refine 50 per cent or more of Nigeria ‘s crude oil.

 

The DPR revoked earlier licences issued to investors in 2004, citing lack of credible milestones by the companies, and introduced the 2007 revised guidelines, which contained the $1million refundable deposit requirement.

 

He added that the government had reviewed the law that guides the establishment of private refineries and was now awaiting the final approval.

 

On the process of getting the licence, the DPR source stated: ‘The first stage is to get a licence to establish. The next stage is the submission of the basic engineering design package of the plants to the DPR at the completion of which an approval to construct would be granted to only those who meet the specifications. Those firms given the licences usually have up to two years to meet the requirements of the second stage, or lose the preliminary licences.

 

‘Successful applicants are expected to meet the necessary requirements under this stage within two years of issuance of the preliminary licences. Companies that fail to meet the above requirements within the stipulated period will automatically lose the preliminary licences.’

 

The last stage of approval is a licence to operate a future plant, which would affect only companies that successfully go through the second state.

 

He said that over the years, many of the applicants got stuck at different stages of the processes of the projects and their licences were withdrawn.

 

A top official of an International Oil Company (IOC), who spoke on the condition  of anonymity, tied  the company’s participation in investing in private refinery to the quick deregulation of the downstream sector.

 

He said that a deregulation policy was the best solution to petroleum scarcity in the country, stating that it was the only condition on which the company would invest in building private refineries in the country.

 

According to the source, ‘we believe that deregulation is the best way forward for the oil and gas industry and the country because if the sector is deregulated, private operators would be able to build new refineries and there would be healthy competition.

 

‘We cannot go into refining because the business environment is not conducive right now.  The banks are not ready to give out loans for such investment and we cannot approach our shareholders. There are so many loopholes.  We do not know the quantity of fuel being brought into this country. Smugglers are smuggling fuel into this country on daily basis and how do you think we would be able to make it? It will not be easy competing with big refineries outside the country. Our company is selling off some of its refineries around the world because of its inability to compete.’

 

He stressed that if the issue of subsidy continued to drag, it would be difficult for practitioners in the industry to build a new refinery.

 

He said the company would continue to operate as a profitable and resilient organisation, able to compete effectively in a fully deregulated downstream industry.

 

Reacting to this development, the President, National Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Dr. Herbert Ajayi, called for an incisive review of the factors that made those previously granted licences for refineries not to start operations, with a view to putting right whatever could have been wrong.

 

‘All private operators previously granted licences for refineries should be re-invited to partner the government and be assured of the supply of feed-stock of crude oil, the refusal of which, NACCIMA understands, aborted their intervention,’ it urged.

 

He stressed the need for government to look critically into the law that abolishes illegal refineries.

 

He said: ‘NACCIMA believes if these illegal refineries are made legal and is effectively done, it would boost local supply capacity of petroleum products, create jobs and invariably may also reduce prices when competition fully takes its course.

 

‘We have watched with dismay the continuous destruction of small refineries classified by government as illegal in the country. We believe that the action of government/Ministry of Petroleum Resources is not the best given the current problem confronting the country in the petroleum sector; as it would further compound the sector’s supply chain of petroleum products. To ensure strict compliance and standards with the laid down criteria by the operators of the small (but now legal) refineries, there is the need for the DPR to assume effective supervisory role,’ he said. (Guardian)

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

JUST IN: Tinubu Meets Ibori, Wike, Makinde In Abuja

Published

on

 

President Bola Tinubu is currently holding a closed door meeting with James Ibori, former Governor of Delta state; Nyesom Wike, the immediate past Governor of Rivers state; and Seyi Makinde, the Oyo State Governor.

 

The meeting is taking place at the President’s office in Aso Villa.

 

Reports say the three politicians arrived at the Aso Rock Villa at about 4:20om on Friday, 2 June, 2023.

 

Details shortly…

Continue Reading

News and Report

Court Orders Union Bank To Pay Former Manager N20.2m Over Wrongful Termination…….

Published

on

Justice Maureen Esowe of the Lagos division of the National Industrial Court has ordered the Union Bank to immediately pay the total sum of N20, 261, 810 million to one of its retired staff, Asenime Claire Ojuzo.

 

The judgment sum according to Justice Esowe, is the shortfall of gratuity Union Bank ought to pay Mrs. Asenime, upon her retirement.

 

Justice Esowe made the order while delivering judgment in a suit marked NICN/LA/534/2017, filed by a retired officer and the bank.

 

The claimant, a former senior manager at Union Bank, through her lawyer, Chief Paul Omoijiade, had asked the court to “declare that the purported approval by the bank of the claimant’s withdrawal from service which the Claimant did not apply for was wrong.

 

“A declaration that the purported determination of the Claimant’s contract of service by Union Bank is wrongful, same having been done without due process as laid down in the bank’s handbook and the bank’s custom and practice.

 

“A declaration that the purported removal of the claimant from his employment as Senior Manager (SM) without due process amounts to redundancy for which the claimant is entitled to redundancy benefit.

 

“A declaration that Union Bank is in arrears of N18, 114, 600 million, in the payment of the Claimant’s gratuity.

 

“A declaration that the deduction of the sum of N16,106,219.66 million, as outstanding loans, status car, unearned medical, outstanding status generator, and car from the claimant’s gratuity is unlawful.

 

“An order of the honourable court directing Union Bank to pay to Ojuzo the sum of N16,106,219.66 million, deducted from the claimant’s gratuity.

 

“An order of the honourable court directing Union Bank to pay to Ojuzo the sum of N18,114, 600 being a shortfall in the gratuity paid to her.

 

“An order of the honourable court that the bank pays the sum of N12 million, to the Claimant as compensation for the defendant’s wrongful and unlawful action withdrawing the claimant’s services without due process.

 

“An order of the honourable court for the payment of interest at the rate of 20% on the deductions and withheld gratuity under paragraphs (f) and (g) above.

 

“An order of the honourable court that the bank pay to the claimant the sum of N1 million, being the cost of litigation.

 

During the trial of the suit, the claimant told the court that she was a staff of the bank until her employment was wrongfully withdrawn on November 22, 2013, and her terminal benefits were never paid in full.

 

She also told the court that Union Bank also deducted the sum of N16, 106, 219.66 million, which the bank referred to as outstanding loans, unearned housing, status car, and unearned leave from her benefit, adding that, said she never applied for withdrawal service, therefore, the withdrawal of her services is tantamount to redundancy.

 

Defending the suit, Union Bank through its witness, Francis Idiaghe, who was led by Feliz O. Ogungbemi, told the court that there is no provision in the Trust Deed of variation that the claimant or any employee of Union Bank can remain in service till the age of 60. Rather, than underemployment, either party can determine the contract by giving a month’s notice.

 

The witness told the court that the Defendant, exercising her right under the contract, determined the contract by a letter of withdrawal of service dated November 22, 2016, issued to the claimant. Adding that the sum of N16,106,219.66 million, deducted from the claimant’s terminal benefits covers the loans (N13,683,188.86 million) taken by the claimant during the pendency of her employment and the outstanding and unpaid money (N2,247,210 million) covering the cost of her status car and a generating set.

 

Union Bank in its final written address, asked the court to determine “Whether the claimant is entitled to a declaration that the withdrawal of the Claimant’s employment is unlawful.

 

“Whether the Claimant having been paid her terminal benefit and having accepted same, can be heard to complain that his contract was not properly determined.

 

“Whether the termination of the Claimant of employment by the Defendant amounts to redundancy.

 

“Whether the Claimant is entitled to the sum of N18,114,600.00 (Eighteen Million One Hundred and Fourteen Thousand Six Hundred Naira) as outstanding gratuity from the Defendant.

 

“Whether the deduction of the sum from the Claimant’s terminal benefit in the liquidation of Claimant’s outstanding staff loans, status, generator loan, and unearned medical is unlawful.

 

“Whether by the evidence placed before this Honourable Court, the Claimant is entitled to damages in the sum of N12 million.

 

“Whether the Claimant is entitled to interest at the rate of 20% on the alleged outstanding gratuity and the amount allegedly deducted from her gratuity.

 

“Whether the Claimant is entitled to the sum of N1 million, as cost of litigation.”

 

Justice Esowe, in her judgment on the suit after the evaluation of parties’ submissions, and citing plethora of legal authorities, held that: “having gone through the claimant’s claim, evidence led in support, the defendant’s defense, evidence led in support, with the final written submissions of Counsel on both sides, this Court, while adopting all the issues formulated by Counsel, has distilled a sole issue for determination, to wit: Whether the Claimant has proved his case to be entitled to the reliefs sought.” culled: Business Hallmark.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Dr. Ope Banwo Speaks On Transitioning  Naija Lives Matter Organization To Non-Partisan Mode 

Published

on

 

 

***Says Organization Will Now Focus On Projects To Improve Nigerian Lives

 

Dr. Ope Banwo, the founder of Naija Lives Matter (NLM), a non-governmental organization committed to better lives for Nigerians has explained the organization’s decision to refocus its priorities.

 

In a statement released on Tuesday, Dr. Banwo stated that the organization’s mission and goals extend beyound the 2023 elections, electioneering campaigns, and politics.

 

According to him, the process of the organization had been clearly communicated from its very beginning to avoid any accusations of opportunism or policy inconsistencies, which are unfortunately common in our country when disagreements arise.

 

He said; “Since 2011, the NLM organization has consistently de-emphasized its partisan support for any specific candidate after the elections and campaigns are over, enabling it to concentrate on its global mandate of making Naija lives matter to all Nigerians, irrespective of their political affiliations.

 

“When Naija Lives Matter endorsed Peter Obi as our chosen candidate in August 2022, we made it clear that our partisan involvement would solely extend until the conclusion of the elections. Subsequently, we would focus on other aspects of our mission and goals, for which our organization was founded in 2011.

 

“In the past, we supported Jonathan through the GEJ project, rallied behind Buhari through the Buhari4Naija project in 2015, and even had a Moghalu4Naija project before eventually endorsing Peter Obi for the 2023 elections.

 

“Our commitment is not irreversibly tied to any particular politician; it lies in what we believe is in the best interest of Nigeria and its people,” Dr. Banwo said.

 

With the transition, NLM now moves beyond the recent election cycle, with a current focus on organizing projects aimed at making the lives of all Nigerians better.

 

“Henceforth, we shall therefore leave the legal and political affairs to lawyers and politicians, and respect the decisions of the courts, whatever they may be.

 

“In alignment with our mandate and the previously declared engagement period for the 2023 elections, we hereby inform our members that Naija Lives Matter will now shift its focus towards other aspects of our charter such as mass non-partisan mobilization on national issues, youth empowerment training, workshops, community assistance services for the less privileged in Nigeria, and other activities.

 

“In light of this new direction, we will convene meetings with our state directors and cell leaders to announce additional NLM initiatives that extend beyond politics in the coming days. These initiatives will focus on non-partisan national mobilization, youth empowerment through training and workshops, and community-building responsibilities.

 

“All our threads on WhatsApp and other social media platforms will once again be dedicated to NLM as we officially conclude the Peter Obi Nation Project for the 2023 elections,” Dr. Banwo noted.

 

Thanking members of the Peter Obi Nation Project of the NLM organization for their tremendous efforts during the 2023 elections, Dr. Banwo said that together they fought valiantly in a highly contested electoral process, adding that together they gave as much as they got in the very bitter partisan electioneering campaign for the organization’s endorsed candidate, Peter Obi.

 

“We did not compromise and many of us even paid the price of alienating some of our long-term friends in the heat of partisan battle.

 

“To this end, I am immensely proud of every individual involved in this monumental battle, and it has been an honor serving as the Chief Vawolence Officer for Naija Lives Matter side of things during this 2923 election cycle. We also offer No apologies for our passionate campaign for what we passionately believed in. It was what it was.

 

Acknowledging the fact that many individuals who joined NLM’s special Peter Obi Nation Project were primarily interested in supporting the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate, and may not share NLM”s broader mandate and NGO charter, Dr. Banwo said that the organization would understand if those solely focused on partisan politics choose to disassociate themselves from the NLM organization across it numerous groups and threads, adding that the organizational continuity transcends any single election cycle.

 

“To be clear, this pivot by NLM does not mean we no longer support Peter Obi. We continue to stand behind his 2023 mandate which we believed in, wholeheartedly. Nevertheless, our organization was not established solely for this election cycle. We have followed the same refocusing approach after the elections in 2011 and 2015. Although the intensity of this cycle was undeniable, our policy remains intact.

 

“We hope that our fellow compatriots engaged in the highly intense campaign for 2023 will understand and respect our decision to shift away from combative partisan politics at this juncture. Instead, we aim to engage the Tinubu government in a non-partisan yet critical manner, reminding them of their promises and holding them accountable. Should the courts later remove him from office, we will also celebrate. But for now, we have a country to assist in governance.”

Continue Reading

Trending