Connect with us

News and Report

Ganduje’s ally, Bala Muhammad fights to repossess multi-billion naira properties seized by Kano government

Published

on

Bala Muhammad, a political ally of former Governor Abdullahi Ganduje, is fighting a relentless battle to recover properties the state government claimed were illegally removed from the Kano State Agricultural Supply Company (KASCO) when Mr Mujammed was its managing director.

In October 2023, the state’s Public Complaint and Anti-Corruption Commission (PCACC) obtained an order from a chief magistrate, Umma Kurawa, to seize the properties, pending the conclusion of an investigation of alleged sleaze at the commission.

A document seen by PREMIUM TIMES listed the items as 14 full trucks with bodies, six truck bodies, four new truck heads, one Mahindra 6005 tractor, one Sino truck Homan and one Maikano van. Also listed are 1,200 bags of raw material Hijeck Chukura, one Mahindra loader, 19 truck tyres without rims, 48 truck tyres with rims, one 300 KVA transformer, two mini tractors with bodies, and one plant generator JMG.

Others are two Howo, one Tata, one Hijet, one mini tractor body, one block moulding machine, one Lister generator and one rigger.

The state high court granted the order to seize the items after the state government arraigned Mr Muhammad and others before the court for the alleged theft of more than N4 billion at KASCO.

However, on 27 November 2024 in another suit Mr Muhammed filed, Justice Aisha Ya’u of Kano State High Court No. 10 ordered the police and the anti-corruption agency to withdraw from the warehouse premises.

However, the agency said it had filed a motion at the court protesting that it was not joined in the suit. The agency’s refusal to comply with the court order led to the police temporarily detaining its chairman, Muhuyi Magagi, last month.

The case against Muhammed

The office of the state’s attorney general had filed a nine-count charge accusing Mr Muhammad and his associates of diverting more than N4 billion from KASCO’s account into various bank accounts between August 2022 and April 2023.

The charge was based on a report by the anti-graft agency alleging that Mr Muhammad, who led KASCO under Mr Ganduje’s administration, conspired with others, including his son, to divert public funds.

“Sometime in August 2022 to 3rd April 2023 or thereabout, the sum of N4,67,290,742.00 (four billion, sixty-seven million, seven hundred and forty-two Naira) only were (was) credited into Kano State Agricultural Supply Company Ltd’s ( KASCO) Account No. 1014477161 domiciled in Zenith Bank Plc and Unity Bank Account No. 0005195864 from Kano State Federal Allocation Account No. 4968083012 domiciled in FCMB within Kano Judicial Division all in the name of grant, but the former managing director dishonestly misappropriated and converted the whole sum belonging to Kano State Government meant as a grant to the state-owned company (KASCO) to other accounts, including his accounts, the act which is an offence under section 308 punishable under section 309 of the Penal Code Law,” the PCACC said in the charges filed on 3 August 2023.

The report further stated that Mr Muhammad unlawfully transferred N20 million from a KASCO account domiciled with Zenith Bank into an FCMB personal account of Mu’azu Ahmad.

He was also accused of diverting N78 million into a business account belonging to Abubakar Bawuro under the pretence of supplying materials, which were never supplied, and another N30 million meant for fertiliser subsidy into a corporate account of the Ganduje Foundation.

Mr Muhammad denied the charges and contested the PCACC’s power to investigate corruption cases, saying only federal anti-corruption bodies have this power.

However, on 18 October 2023, the court ruled that PCACC could investigate, arrest, and refer a matter to the state’s attorney general for prosecution.

“Under section 15 (1) (a) and (b) of the state Anti-Corruption Enabling law, it shall have the power to receive and investigate any allegation of corrupt practices against any person and refer the matter to the attorney general of the state for necessary action”, the court had ruled.

The case is ongoing as the court has fixed 26 February for the presentation of witnesses in the case against Mr Muhammad and others.

Fight over properties

Meanwhile, Mr Muhammad, through his lawyer, Tahir Ibrahim, wrote to the police and PCACC, asking them to unseal the warehouse in compliance with Justice Ya’u’s order of November 2024.

The police complied and withdrew their officers from the property but the state’s anti-corruption agency did not, saying it was not joined in the suit from which the order emanated.

On 24 January, police officers from Abuja arrested the chairman of the anti-corruption agency, Mr Magagi, over his agency’s refusal to unseal the warehouse.

However, Mr Magagi was released the following day.

The commission’s lawyer, Zaharaddeen Kofar-Mata, told PREMIUM TIMES that the police accused Mr Magaji of illegally sealing off a private warehouse.

Mr Kofar-mata questioned the validity of the court order for the unsealing of the property.

“They lied to the court that they had resolved their differences with the anti-corruption commission and had the name of the agency struck out of the case. That was a deliberate act of obtaining default judgement. This Commission suspected that they connived with the legal section of the police, who refused to file any defence. When the default judgment was awarded, the Commission quickly filed a motion to re-join the matter and have the judgement set aside.

“Generally, the legal implication is that they cannot impose the judgement until that motion has been decided in one way or the other. The Commission, which is not a party to the judgement and which in law is the custodian and the current possessor of the seized properties, is not bound by the judgement,” Mr Kofar-Mata stated.

As of Friday, the anti-graft agency was still restricting access to the warehouse.

Mr Muhammad could not be reached by phone or through other contacts to comment on the issue.

 

Source: Premium Times

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Beware of fake Oxycontin in circulation, NAFDAC warns public

Published

on

By

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control has alerted the public on falsified Oxycontin 80mg (oxycodone hydrochloride) which it says was detected in an unregulated market in Switzerland.

The public alert with No. 07/2025 was uploaded on the agency’s website on Thursday.
The agency said the issue about falsified medicine was reported to the World Health Organisation by the genuine manufacturer, MUNDIPHARMA, in February.

It said the falsified product imitated the genuine OXYCONTIN 80mg authorised for sale in Poland, adding that the genuine OXYCONTIN (oxycodone hydrochloride) is a semi-synthetic opioid indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.

It said laboratory tests of samples for the falsified product were conducted by the Drug Information Centre in Zurich, Switzerland, and that WHO, DIZ’s drug-checking service determined that the tablets did not contain oxycodone but a synthetic opioid likely to be a nitazene compound.

According to NAFDAC, Nitazene derivatives (e.g., metonitazene, isotonitazene, fluonitazene) are potent synthetic opioids, primarily used in research due to their high addiction potential and severe side effects.

It said these substances could be hundreds of times stronger than oxycodone, posing a high overdose risk, stressing that limited information is available on their risks, toxicity, side effects, and long-term consequences.

“The identified product in this alert is confirmed as falsified on the basis that it deliberately/fraudulently misrepresented its identity, composition, or source.

“The falsified product imitates OXYCONTIN 80mg manufactured and marketed by MUNDIPHARMA in the Polish market. MUNDIPHARMA has confirmed that the product was falsified and was not produced by their company.

“This falsified product has been found to contain undeclared nitazene compounds, which pose a significant risk due to the high likelihood of adverse events, even in small doses. Nitazenes produce similar effects to other opioids.

“Their high potency carries a high risk of overdose and death. Using nitazene derivatives has been linked to several deaths.

“Mixing them with other depressants like alcohol or benzodiazepines can be very dangerous, leading to severe effects like respiratory depression, low blood pressure, coma, or even death,” NAFDAC said.

It said that this falsified product posed a particular risk to individuals with substance use disorders who might perceive this falsified product as a safe and quality-assured medicine.

NAFDAC said that visible discrepancies were observed on the falsified product such as the placement of the batch and expiry dates on the counterfeit product were incorrect.

It added that the falsified product batch and expiry date are visible on the front side of the blister strip, adding that genuine OXYCONTIN has the batch and expiry date visible on the back of the blister strip.

NAFDAC stated that on the falsified product, the expiry date is on the left and the batch number is on the right, pointing out that genuine OXYCONTIN has the batch number on the left and the expiry date on the right.

According to NAFDAC, all its zonal directors and state coordinators have been instructed to conduct surveillance and retrieve any falsified products of this medicine found within their zones and states in Nigeria.

It said that importers, distributors, retailers, healthcare professionals, and consumers are hereby advised to exercise caution and vigilance within the supply chain to avoid importation, distribution, sale, and use of falsified OXYCONTIN tablets.

NAFDAC said that all medical products/ medical devices must be obtained from authorised/licensed suppliers, stressing that products’ authenticity and physical condition should be carefully checked.

It advised healthcare professionals and consumers to report any suspicion of the sale of substandard and falsified medicines or medical devices to the nearest NAFDAC office, or call NAFDAC on 0800-162-3322 or via email: sf.alert@nafdac.gov.ng.

It said that healthcare professionals and patients are also encouraged to report adverse events or side effects related to the use of medicinal products or devices to the nearest NAFDAC office.

NAFDAC said that healthcare professionals and patients could also report to the agency through the use of the E-reporting platforms available on the NAFDAC website www.nafdac.gov.ng or via the Med- safety application available for download on android and IOS stores or via e-mail on pharmacovigilance@nafdac.gov.ng

NAN

Continue Reading

News and Report

Rivers emergency rule: Why I walked out – Senator Dickson opens up on what happened at Senate close section

Published

on

By

The lawmaker representing the Bayelsa West Senatorial District, Senator Seriake Dickson, has revealed that he walked out of the red chamber on Thursday following a heated argument regarding the approval of the State of Emergency in Rivers State.

SOCIETY REPORTERS reports that the Senate on Thursday approved the emergency rule and the six-month suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and all the state lawmakers, as declared by President Bola Tinubu on Tuesday.

During the Thursday plenary, Senator Dickson, who stiffly opposed the proclamation, had a brief argument with the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, before the House proceeded to a closed session.

In a statement on Friday, Senator Dickson revealed that he raised his “objections in the closed session on how the declaration fell short of constitutional prescription based on my views as a Democrat, sworn to uphold the Nigerian constitution.”

The lawmaker also revealed that though the Senate did not undertake the debate in an open session, “it was quite robust.”

The former governor of Bayelsa State listed Senators Waziri Tambuwal and Enyinnaya Abaribe among those who kicked against the proclamation.

Part of the statement reads: “I left the plenary before the Senate President was directed to report the outcome because I didn’t want to be present while what I opposed was being reported. I believe Senator Tambuwal, Senator Abaribe, and others also left.

“I want to make it clear that, as I stated repeatedly, I spoke and voted against the proclamation in our closed session, supported by Senator Aminu Tambuwal and a few other senators who were not recognized to speak.

“And so I want to thank all the senators who shared the view that I vigorously canvassed.

“I am, however, aware of the efforts made to modify the declaration as a result of the concerns and views we have expressed and canvassed over the past few days.

“Though I acknowledge the effort being made by the leadership and the President to moderate the terms of the declaration and to create a mechanism for oversight, theoretically, this does not counter the primary issue of constitutionality.

“The beauty of democracy is such that the minority will have their say while the majority will have their way.

“I would have wished for a more robust and open debate so that all views and opinions could be openly canvassed, as I requested even at the closed session specifically, and thereafter, the majority could have their way. But as it is, both chambers have decided, and the ball is now in the court of the other arms of government, especially the judiciary, in the event of any challenge.”

Continue Reading

News and Report

Just In: Court restrains INEC from receiving petition for recall of Natasha

Published

on

By

The Federal High Court, Lokoja, has granted an interim injunction restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, from receiving petitions for the purpose of initiating a recall process against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

SOCIETY REPORTERS reports that the push to recall the suspended senator intensified on Thursday, with more groups in Kogi Central throwing their weight behind the process.

However, a group of Ebira indigenes refuted the claim that the recall process was being sponsored and influenced with money by Akpoti-Uduaghan’s political opponents.

Nevertheless, the court, which gave the order on Thursday, also restricted INEC staff, agents, privies, or assigns from accepting or acting on any petition containing fictitious signatures of purported members of the Kogi Central Senatorial District and from conducting any referendum pending the determination of the motion on notice to the same effect.

The court, according to the order paper made available to newsmen on Friday morning, granted the application following an ex-parte application for an interim injunction supported by an affidavit of extreme urgency.

The court processes were sworn to by Anebe Jacob Ogirima for himself and four others who are registered voters and constituents of the Kogi Central Senatorial District of Kogi State.

However, the application was moved by Smart Nwachimere, Esq., of West-Idahosa, SAN & Co., but the case has been adjourned to May 6, 2025, for a report of service and further mention.

Reacting to the development, a pressure group, Action Collective, commended the judiciary for granting the order.

The group’s coordinator, Dr. Onimisi Ibrahim, said in his reaction that the order would further expose the impunity of some sponsored individuals behind the failed plot to recall Senator Natasha.

Continue Reading

Trending